For those looking to get a hair transplant now (my take on the recent matador)

I apologize for responding with excitement for some time.
In the recent war on vendors and part-timers, I'm quite excited and I've been aggressive with the response.
I ask for your forgiveness and understanding in this regard.
At the same time, I would like to explain some matador.

If you read my article again, it will be more clear, but the cost of 5 million won to 7 million won is not referring to a specific hospital, but to the high cost of surgery.
It resembles the Chosun Ilbo to misuse the part and unfold the logic as if the whole thing was misrepresented.
This can only be seen as a willingness to dilute the nature of the problem.
When did I say that Kyungpook National University is 7 million won?
Please read the following. It's a quote from my article.

"I'm sorry that the crude oil is too rough, but please be aware that Dr. Kim's monopoly on medicine, such as the gangster family, is causing many problems.
The cost of 5 million won to 7 million won has not changed for years since the market price was formed.
As a result, nurse-centered procedures that have lowered costs in every way have come out as an alternative, but so far, they have not been able to reduce market prices. That's how much the patient's trust in your hair transplant method is high. Furthermore, do you think 5 million won is less?
If so, you are a privileged class.
Many bald people entered the site, hoped for a while, and then disappointed by the high cost, returned to their seats, saying, "It's about 5 million won...If your bald head recovers with 5 million won... than those who make reservations for surgery immediately, Lee Sang is a privileged class.
Even if I was given preferential treatment, this is obviously a socially distorted cost and one that is beyond what many dare to try.

I'm attacking some specific hospitals by pointing them out.
The hospitals, in my opinion, are well-skilled and competitive, but they are demanding significant surgical costs just like other hospitals, and there is a sort of cartel formed around certain universities.
From what I hear, there are definitely hospitals that demand surgery costs close to 7 million won, and other hospitals also require at least 5 million won.
I can only point out that this cost is extremely high in terms of social reference.

However, my intention to distort the fact itself using very little content seems to be an example of the Chosun Ilbo's manipulation of the press.
It's definitely a matador that induces some partial mistakes or facts as if the whole thing is misrepresented. In a word, it's waterboarding.
We want to make it clear that we are patients and have the right to operate at the right cost and 5 million won is an excessive cost.

Let's simply define the cost of surgery as 5 million won and analyze it.
Let's say there are a total of five people on the hair separation team. And let's say that one skilled doctor does the procedure himself. And, let's say it's a private hospital.

First, this surgery does not require much technology investment.
You never need expensive equipment worth 700 million won to 1.2 billion won like the LASIK surgery I gave earlier.
Second, I don't think this surgery requires a high degree of technology.
There are some differences between reliability and advanced technology from experience.
This procedure is different from the newly developed cancer removal surgery.
In other words, it doesn't require dangerous or highly intensive technology to come and go for life.
Even if you doze off or make a mistake for a while, you can plant a few strands of hair incorrectly or kill the existing hair roots. Hair root separators are the degree to remove hair roots neatly with a surgical scalpel without injuring the hair roots, and the operator plants the hair roots at an appropriate angle, distribution, and depth. It is believed to be a procedure that can be learned through some skill.
Third, the mechanical judgment of the cost.
This operation is difficult to receive more than one person a day due to concentration and fatigue.
On average, you can get three or four patients a week, or at most five patients.
However, we cannot help but borrow social standards to define this cost as acceptable. Because the arithmetic evaluation of a job cannot actually be objective.
How dare you say 119 crews should receive an average of 1.6 million won a month?
Can you say that their salary should be only 1.6 million won, even though they had been saved by 119 members, and even though they were able to save their lives by the base and personal experience of 119 members at that time?
(So, I have to say that some people's opinion that the cost of the surgery is acceptable is a subjective view that relies on personal empiricism. It's a view that says, "I somehow ended up paying for it and the results were good after the surgery, so I don't think the surgery cost is bad...") If you calculate this by borrowing social criteria, it's as follows.
5 million won X 15 days = 75 million won, 5 nurses X average 2 million won per month = 10 million won per month for hospital maintenance and depreciation costs and other 5 million won per month 50 million won per month X December = 600 million won per year I'm not sure if this is correct.
However, I believe that this cost is a bit excessive even by general standards.
I believe that if you earn 6 billion won in 10 years without interest, it is definitely more than the price of being a doctor.
In Korean society, there are only a few people and companies who can earn 6 billion won in net profit in 10 years without any interest.
At the same time, it is my judgment that the standard for exchanging the price of a person's two or three months' labor for a day's labor is clearly exaggerated and distorted.
It's generally concluded that the value of your professional work is only 1/60 or 1/90 compared to their work.
This is my standard of social reference.
In addition, unlike regular plastic surgery, this procedure is almost an exhausting struggle to overcome the overwhelming complex rather than the intention of being prettier.
Therefore, I would like to emphasize that it is contradictory to some extent to compare this procedure with normal plastic surgery.
It could be like a comparison between recovering a burned face and undergoing double eyelid surgery.

Simply argued, it is a suggestion that the surgical cost of 3 million won is the most appropriate.
You have to have surgery until the third round to brag about this.
So, even if you assume that you're going to invest nearly 10 million won.
I dare say that this cost is a hopeful level that even poor bald people will have a chance to have surgery if they try hard.
I think if we save a couple of years, we will be able to pay for this and get out of our old complex.

In my opinion, surgery costs of more than 5 million won are definitely only for certain classes.
I'm emphasizing this point as a third priest.
Doctor's direct procedure for 3 million won. This is what I think is the ideal hair transplant.

I desperately seek your participation.
If we aim for a society where we live together, I believe it is the courtesy of the possessor to wait at least six months for the poor bald people who are running behind, even if they have the capital to get surgery even if they pay a high enough price.
The so-called "noblesse oblige" in a small sense.

So, regardless of which hospital is good or bad, I want us all to join in the Cold War of six months.
Just because you're having surgery in six months won't make a big difference in the outcome.
Just for the sake of one common good, let's give each other some time and have a six-month boycott or Cold War.

In fact, I may not have to wait six months, but I don't want to conclude that.

I'm meeting my friends today.
My friends and I are going to discuss some things in depth and we're going to try some of the things that we can do right now.
Even if the implementation method is rather direct, it will be implemented within the boundaries of the law, and it may be a useless approach if the hospital has not done anything that violates the law.

So I want to ask you a few things.
But I won't ask too much.
If you have time, please post your opinions on Bobusu, Cheong Wa Dae, Hankyoreh, and Kyungpook National University HomeP.
If you can't afford it, please postpone the surgery for only six months.
If your participation is consistent, it will produce clear results.
This is a world that lives together and maybe it's a liberation for bald people.
Also, it could be the true meaning of this site's existence.

We are patients who can improve through surgery and at the same time deserve proper surgery at the right cost.
Let's unite together to restore our rights.
It's six months from now, so until November of this year.
Let's hang in there until then.

Once again, assuming that this cost is a capitalist cost incurred by the supply and demand of the market, we see that the distortion of the cost can be actively corrected from the consumer's point of view.
And my judgment is that six months is enough.

I trust you guys.

P.S: For those who have already had surgery at a high cost, I hope you don't urge your members anymore, even if your stomach hurts a little.
It's already enough. That's all right.
You've given me enough information, and I understand the results. Thank you. So please stop controlling.
I don't doubt the intention of those who leave cell phone contacts or those who show considerable kindness.
However, I just urge them to embrace even the poor bald people with a wider generosity. And, it can be said that it is fundamentally wrong to slander a particular hospital.
But we can complain about certain hospitals because we are both patients and consumers at the same time.
Especially when it's not about technology or a certain way, but it's about total issues like cost.
In addition, we urge members to actively respond to the ambiguous matador of the suppliers.
I think matador like this is repeated because we only think of ourselves as stupid consumers.
We may be bald, but we are not stupid.