[re] The falsehood and thread of hair transplant surgery not taught by doctors or hospitals.

>**** First of all, I pray for the repose of the late Kim Sun-il. ****** >Hello? >> When I visited Daedamo to post again today, there was a person who impersonated my ID, "Turly", and worked on my behalf. Anyway, thank you for your hard work, and I'm glad to see the replica(?) fur. My position on this will be mentioned again at the end of my post today.
>Then I'll get to the point and post the article of this series.
>> >< Mega-session is not desirable?>>> Perhaps if you visit a hospital with some basic knowledge of hair transplantation and consult with a doctor, your biggest concern is the cost of surgery, and the second is how much the hair loss area can be restored by surgery.
> After answering the cost of surgery, the doctor's answer, which is often heard even by patients with serious hair loss, is, "Because you're in the process of hair loss, planting more than 1,500, 2,000, or 2,500 hairs at a time is not desirable for later", or "It's bad for your body", etc., is an answer to avoid hair transplantation of more than 2,000, 2,500, or 3,000 hairs for some reason. In other words, looking at the degree of hair loss progression, there are secondary, tertiary, even fourth, or fifth operations waiting in the future.
> Mega-session is not desirable. Is it true? Mega-sessions are currently a global trend in the latest hair transplant surgery, and due to the rapid development of surgical techniques, more than 1,500 hair follicle units were generally defined as mega-sessions in the past, and many foreign hospitals have recently defined more than 2,000, 2,500, and even 3,000 units as mega-sessions. Since the progression of hair loss is unpredictable by no one, even a specialist, surgery should be performed while looking at the progression of hair loss. It seems to anyone to be a medically undeniable logic. However, behind this logic is the unspeakable circumstances of domestic hospitals.
>Before we find out about the situation, should we first look at the merits of the mega-session to help you understand? To make it easy to understand, I organized it as follows.
> The advantages of mega-session >1. dramatically reduce the number of surgeries.
>2. Minimize hair waste by reducing airway scarring through repeated procedures (for the future) >3. You can get the best beauty effect with one operation.
>4. Reduce surgery pain and discomfort.
>5. It drastically reduces the cost of surgery for hair reconstruction.
>6. Provide the best psychological satisfaction.
>>Because of the obvious advantages above, megasessions are already common in hair transplantation in developed countries. In other words, there is a consensus among consumers (hair loss patients) and hair professionals about their effectiveness and effectiveness, and in order to meet the needs of consumers, the medical community has steadily developed procedures and technologies to meet their needs. But what about our country? Due to the lack of awakening of consumers (hair loss patients), aren't they still blind to outdated procedures and money-making, so they are misleading hair loss patients to maintain producer-oriented procedures and procedures to suit their tastes?
>Then should we find out why domestic hospitals avoid mega-sessions and what's behind them? There are preconditions for a mega-session to succeed. That is, the implantation rate should be high. Then, what should be the premise to increase the hair pigmentation rate?" >1. Elaborate follicle separation by microscope should be preceded, and for the >2.3000 follicle unit, the total procedure time should be completed within 6 to 8 hours, and >3. Many experienced and trained medical staff and staff are required to perform this.
>In order to save labor costs and maximize profits, domestic hair hospitals that use hair follicle separation business travel services do not have more than 2,000 hair or 2,500 hair follicles. In other words, if you overdo it, the probability of surgery failure is too high due to the low incidence rate, so you don't have to buy it on purpose and create a problem. And more important than anything else is the benefits of continuous repeat surgery, ignoring the pain and discomfort of hair loss patients and blinding them to making money. Therefore, hair transplant hospitals can reduce the elements of medical disputes and increase sales, so isn't it simply "eating pheasants and eggs"?
>For your information, most hair transplant centers in the United States avoid hair transplantation for ethical reasons for young people up to their mid-20s in Norwood stage 2. First, let's treat it with medicine and then perform surgery. In Korea, young people in their early 20s with a Norwood scale of M-shaped hair loss of less than 2, and 1,500 hair transplants are rampant, and Korean doctors talk to those looking at the 4th to 5th stages without blinking. We're talking about additional surgery a year later for reasons like "It's not good to have more than 2,000 hair at a time," "It's too much for your body," and "It's better to have surgery while watching your hair loss progress in the future." So, are the hair surgeons in developed countries doing mega-sessions all unscrupulous in random surgery without considering hair loss progression?
>However, this is a bigger problem, as some hair centers that conduct mega-session in Korea are conducting clinical tests on hair loss patients while boldly receiving a large amount of money without considering their mega-session treatment ability at all. They are making hair loss people cry even more by saying that they are separating hair follicles by a false microscope. In conclusion, mega-session is not a desirable surgical method because hair loss progression should be considered, so it is an exaggerated concept to cover the limitations and capabilities of the domestic medical community. For those who have progressed to Norwood stage 3 or higher, it is a surgery to reduce the pain, cost, and inconvenience of the patient's future surgery and achieve maximum effectiveness, and it is already performed in advanced countries such as the United States in consideration of future hair loss progress, and it is a generalized surgical method.
><<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When I visited here to post a series of articles today, a fake "Hair" appeared and misled you, there was a really ridiculous and absurd thing that happened. However, I think members quickly noticed that it was fake. So far and in the future, I will be acting with the IP address at the end of this article, and I will continue to do so. If necessary, if you look up the IP of my previous article, you will be able to distinguish between the real "hair fur" and the fake "hair fur".
>> Before I started this series, I pointed out that the Daemo site is not a consumer communication, but a producer communication. For me, this is the fundamental motivation and purpose of starting this article. Therefore, it was our hope that the truth and information that had been hidden in the dark curtains, unknown by many members, would be helpful for our hair loss people to make corrections and decisions so that the current state and errors of domestic hair transplant surgery that have been misrecognized unilaterally by the producer group could be corrected. Therefore, the domestic hair transplant medical community, which is a frog in a well, must awaken and work hard, and we believe that only when we wake up as wiser consumers can our hair transplant community develop together and expect cheaper and more stable medical services.
>It is a fact that at the beginning of the first series of my article, the comparison between domestic and American hospitals to inform the current status of domestic hospitals was blurred by the operational forces who rose up like bees and drove me to the front of the American people, blurring the fundamental purpose and tone of the article.
>>I can't help but be thrilled to see the childish and abominable method of trying to blur the tone of my writing and blur the focus of my writing by undermining my personality by making it seem like I'm attacking 弘 Do, 弘 Do, and Da-da by provoking the anger of me, Da-da. It's pathetic how you don't know that these mean, low-key black propaganda and actions end up like lying down and drooling, and this reality is even deplorable.
>Anyway, I hope that this will serve as an opportunity for you to feel how confusing the domestic hair transplant surgery industry is and how much the mass production site is a producer-oriented dog-eat-dog communication. Looking at this situation, I feel more motivated by neglecting serialization for personal reasons. If a man drew a knife once, he should cut any...….. Anyway, I will go the way I want to go. It's up to you all to see what you think. And I'm going to write based on my personal knowledge, facts, and information. Now, operational forces, if I'm alone and you're a lot more outnumbered and you're a lot of people, wouldn't it be even more convincing than today's vague personal attacks, groundless claims, deterrence, speculation, assumptions, black propaganda?
>><<<<<<<<<<<弘 P.S. Do: In the past, I have received a lot of useful information, and I could feel your warm personality, which always comes from gentle writing, through the mass bulletin board. Thank you very much for taking this opportunity. And as you said publicly from the beginning, in a long time ago, the manufacture of mosquitoes.I was well aware that you were in the sales business. Nevertheless, all DaMo members are well aware that they have provided relatively objective and detailed information, which has given useful and valuable information to many people with hair loss, including me. However, it's my personal opinion, but in your writing this year, unlike in the past, it makes me feel sad for some reason. If I ask you one thing, I don't think you'll get ridiculous personal attacks from this mean fake if you always remind yourself that you're part of a group of producers. In the future, 弘 Do, I look forward to providing more and more useful information that is not biased toward DaMo members. Stay healthy throughout >>>>> >> [This post was copied from 2006-06-2204:32:55 hair transplant by the chief administrator]