20 months after the first surgery, 8 months after the second surgery... now

It's been a long time since I've been here.

I've been trying not to care about my hair, but I don't really care anymore. As a result, it's been a while since I heard this place.

I've been reading a few pages of posts... That's interesting. There are a lot of things... Anyway, I'm not going to talk about anything else, I'm just going to talk about the current state.

As you all know, to sum up my progress...

Was it 1996 or '97? (Well, actually, I don't even remember.) Anyway, it was spring...) I was thinking about it and started using Company M's attachable wig as a joke (with the thought of not using it if it's weird after trying it once). Until then, the situation was that hair loss on the top of the head (it's actually not completely gone, but I think it would have been possible to correct it if I had Professionalsia at the time) and the part of the hair was slightly lighter, and the overall hair was slightly reduced. In other words, if only the top of the head was covered like a Jewish hat, everything was OK. But the partial wig was covered in areas that were larger than the original area of hair loss to make it natural, to reinforce the thinned part of the hair, and, crucially, to make it secure.

However, after a year and a half of attachment, it will be changed to detachable. There's a lot of reasons, but.. In a year and a half of unconsciousness, the top of the head was really hairless, and the hair fell out so much to the part of the hair and the m shape, so now I'm really bald. The good thing is that the front hair is not much, but it was maintained to some extent. I think this is probably because from the first time I made the wig, the bangs were dug in a U-shape just to use my hair. In other words, it should be considered that a large number of the heads covered with unconventional wigs were sacrificed.

After switching to a removable one, I moved to a wig company a few times... This is because I wasn't satisfied with one company. Some companies don't like how to make wigs, some don't like how they cut their hair, some are expensive, some are secretly forcing me to wear new wigs... Every time, I got a wig from a different company.

Still, after changing to removable, hair loss is not completely stationary, but it has entered a very slow stabilization period.

Then, during the autumn of 2004 (September), I had the first surgery at a junior hospital I knew impulsively.

I'm sure you all know what's going on after that.. Or you can look it up..

Let's report on the current status.

In the picture above, only my picture is enlarged among the indoor group photos, and only the head is cut with the free CAPTURE program. There's no photoshop on this computer, and there's no other program to watch Lee Jimi... I just used this to get the screenshot. I don't care about my hair these days, and I don't take pictures of my hair... I chose it from the photos I took recently.

Right now... I don't use wigs anymore. So I think we should change Nick from the 7th year of wigs (no actually 10th year) now. When I first took off the wig (5 months after the second operation), I was a little shy, weird, empty, and cold, but now it's natural, and I keep brushing my hair with my hands, and someone I haven't seen in a long time seems kind of tilted in my amortization, and some people say, "You've lost some hair because you're having trouble these days..." or "You're getting older and you're becoming more like your father..." but I'm still in trouble... There's no one who thinks you're bald.

Currently, the part of the hair is a little light from the front, and overall, it is not bald with little hair. -Of course this is my opinion.)

Maybe some people will argue that if they have less hair, it's less hair, but it doesn't make sense that they're not bald. These people are definitely not our comrades or hair loss people.

Most people think it's like that, but we're M-shaped even with the same hair loss, top of the head, grade 1, 2, 3... What should we do to share? So, to tell you the current state, I have no choice but to say that I am not bald, but I have little hair.

The top part of the head grows slowly, and the short hair is easily lost, and some hair grows out without being eliminated... I think so. In other words, I think hair transplantation has a great effect on the front.

Of course, the reason for the slight lack of the top of the head may be that Pka has been almost inadequate.

It's because after the surgery, I ate hard for about two months, and suddenly my liver level rose a lot, so I took almost two months off the medicine. And then I started again, but I almost ate it once I remembered it. Sometimes, the gap dropped for more than two weeks, and in the beginning, I ate healthy food... These days, not at all...


I'm telling you everything..

Here's the summary.

1. Now I don't use wigs anymore.
2. An attachable wig is a rat poison. And it's not too late now, so we need to change it quickly.
3. Hair transplants are much more effective on the front. Perhaps it would be the best candidate for the letter M.
4. Let's not operate on people who have lost a little bit of their hair. If you operate when you're quite out of it after a while, you can go back to a little out of it, but if you operate too early, it's like throwing away a card too early.
5. In the case of those who fall under paragraph 4 above, that is, those who have reached the point of having to undergo surgery, it is best to plant a lot. The doctor said that it is okay to have only 2,000 hairs or 300 hairs now, but 1> It is not enough to have surgery now.. If it's a story or if it's enough to have surgery, it's a nonsense. Because the opportunities for surgery, the physical conditions to operate, the cost, etc. are limited..

Oh.. one more thing, if you look at my surgery picture, there's a picture of me with my bangs down overall. In response to this, someone said, "That's wrong... I also rewrote Rae Nyoji's post, and I was also worried that at first I said, "I don't need a bang hairline..." and then I said, "I'll just go with your opinion." But…... Looking at it now, I think it's a good idea to plant your bangs closely with your hairline down. If I hadn't had my bangs down, I think I would have looked much less hair, or I would have had wrinkles on my forehead and gone up a little bit, making my baldness look worse.

Recently, I sometimes think about doing the third round. I think it'll be a lot more natural in a little while...There is no end to a person's greed.

[This post was copied from 2006-06-2204:32:55 hair transplant by the CEO]