the latest popular post

Last week's comment ranking

1back K4958360347
2back 바람의꽥꽥이
3back K4971258010
4back K29643000722308141718
5back padakpadak

6back BlackForest
7back K5003734967
8back K4765568083
9back K4997213199A
10back 05년생운동선수

Technology...

18years ago
1,317

List
Write

There's a comparison of wigs to medicines.. You shouldn't compare wigs to medicines. The medicine is scientifically proven to be effective, and the wig is just.. If I say that my technology is the best, that's all. Even if consumers are not satisfied with the technology, they can cover it with false or exaggerated advertisements. The cost of the wig is 150,000 won and the cut fee is usually 20,000 to 30,000 won, but let's say it's 50,000 won, plus labor costs, margins, rent, research expenses, etc., so if it's the best wig, 40 to 60 is appropriate. If you have enough technology to receive more than that, I think you should make it almost the same as your actual hair. It's not obvious.. The reality is that it does not have that level of technology, but increases the margin in the name of technology. As you may know if you watched the actual broadcast, there is no special difference between companies in technology and know-how.. The word technology... I think it's the best word to pack to really increase the margin. It can mislead consumers, and at the same time, it can increase margins.. If you sell 150,000 won for 1.2 million won and the technical and research expenses are more than 600,000 won, is this set as normal? Is it possible that the seller's superior position to the hair loss person is being used to interfere with fair trade??