I've posted once and I was surprised by the too small teckle.
I tried to answer my post Tekle with an easy price argument, but I'll start with a more tequel style
1. My argument is as follows.
=> There should be a style where you can see the forehead line and hair part.
Here's the tickle for that.
=> I don't know if a style in my 40s like me should have a forehead line and a part, but that's not the style these days.
He points out that he doesn't know the style these days. These days, it is the style of youth to do it without parting your hair and showing your forehead.
2. All wigs now have skins on their bangs.
And I think there's also a technique called Fire Part.
But if you're a style that covers everything with your hair like in the photo review, why do you put the skin on the front and do the fire part?
Skin or fire parts are factors that increase the price.
The biggest factor that separates mesh wigs from skin wigs is to save the front forehead line and part of the hair.
If you can style enough with just a mesh wig without skin technology, make a wig without skin, without parting...No, that was the case in the past, so we have to make products based on the deteriorated wig technology and match the price.
Why do you need a fire part for bang skin or part if you're doing well with bang skin and don't need a real style forehead and don't need a part?
Don't increase the price by attaching unnecessary technology and just be honest.
3 In my post, people who don't do Tekle are curious about my style, but I'm almost an all-back person. I'm old, so I just went around with my own style.
And I was the one who created the style, and when I came out of Himo with monthly care, it was just Hoseob's hair.
I hate Himo. I have an old picture, but I'm afraid that Tekle is welcome in that picture, but if I go to Himo, I'm going to go to Himo because I know he'll do it like that.
I hope you don't say you're happy with your hi-mo.. Ha, Mo, it's really like a company. It's amazing that there's still this unconceptual "ㄱㅅ" in Korea under the name of "company."
Comments 19