the latest popular post

Last week's comment ranking

1back K4984376008
2back cyunty99
3back K4979166048
4back K44061050622508202112
5back K4964508705

6back 웁스라요
7back K4983758792
8back K4989564954
9back 겸이경이
10back K4986541807

[General] [re] The wig was made wrong. -3

22years ago
823

>Six people in charge attended, and the words I said on the phone continued again, starting with the words to decide a dispute over the problem.
>To conclude with my own problem, the repair request for the front forehead was only recorded three times in the first wig, and even if I fixed 1mm, it was fixed, and there was a difference of 5mm compared to the original plate (which was printed before the wig fitting), so I repeatedly asked for repair and asked why I insisted that I didn't fix this much. There are three times left on the record, but I only repeated that I did my best to say that it was only this much, and that if there is a lie on the record, I will be punished. And don't you think you need to fix it bigger if you've repeated it a few times Lastly, I can't talk anymore
>When I asked if I should at least fix it prominently, I made an excuse that if I suddenly raise it, I can't reduce it later. In the end, how long does it mean that the repair will continue, and did we have to use the best-known Beomeo branch for the repair?
>
>And I heard that I visited the Daegu branch about 11 times a month
>It's a lie and I just repeated that it came down six times.
>I already said that on the phone, and it's not accurate about the number of times, so think so
> Despite being in charge of Daegu, the person in charge of Daegu repeated this advantage several times. I don't know why you emphasize this point when it's not like coming down and trying to pick a fight over the refund amount and compensation.
>
>The conclusion is that Company H's position is not responsible for the problem from the record,
>I told Company H's position that I, as a user, have too many complaints.
>You have to cover up the examination to get a refund, and you invited me to Daegu to cover up the dispute
>It's all.
>
>My position was to compare the hair loss status of the wig and the spring pool to determine the difference
>Company H avoided this without answering.
>Was it necessary to bring a person to Daegu while struggling again for such a documentary debate
>You can talk about this on the phone,
>Why are you avoiding talking about my hair loss status?
>After that, he admitted his negligence, but he never said that today.

I'd like to admit my negligence, apologize, and ask for your understanding to make it again... Hmm...
I think the officials, the designers in charge, the branch managers..That's right...
The above people in the company don't know the process... I hope it works out well