the latest popular post

Last week's comment ranking

1back K4984376008
2back cyunty99
3back K4979166048
4back K44061050622508202112
5back K4964508705

6back K4983758792
7back 겸이경이
8back K4986541807
9back K29871655702308272049
10back 이쁜이마를살리다

[General] [re] The wig was made wrong. -3

22years ago
804

>
>>6 people in charge attended, and the words I said on the phone continued again, starting with the words to decide on a dispute over the problem.
>>To conclude with my own problem, the repair request for the front forehead was recorded only 3 times in the first wig, and it was fixed even if it was fixed by 1mm, and there was a difference of 5mm compared to the original plate (which was printed before the wig fitting), so I repeatedly asked for repair, so I asked why didn't I fix it this much. There are three times left on the record, but I only repeated that I did my best to say that it was only this much, and that if there is a lie on the record, I will be punished. And don't you think you need to fix it bigger if you've repeated it a few times Lastly, I can't talk anymore
>> When I asked if I should at least fix it prominently, I made an excuse that if I suddenly raise it, I can't reduce it later. In the end, how long does it mean that the repair will continue, and did we have to use the best-known Beomeo branch for the repair?
>>
>>And I heard that I visited the Daegu branch about 11 times a month
>>It's a lie and I just repeated that it came down six times.
>>I already said that on the phone, and I'm not sure about the number of times, so think so
>> Despite being in charge of Daegu, the person in charge of Daegu repeated this advantage several times. I don't know why you emphasize this point when it's not like coming down and trying to pick a fight over the refund amount and compensation.
>>
>>The conclusion is that Company H's position is not responsible for the problem on the record,
>>I told Company H's position that I, as a user, have too many complaints.
>>You have to cover the examination to get a refund, and you invited me to Daegu to cover the dispute
>>It's all.
>>
>>My position was to compare the hair loss status of the wig and the spring pool to determine the dispute, but
>>Company H avoided the benefit without answering.
>>Was it necessary to bring a person to Daegu while struggling again for such a documentary debate
>>You can talk about this on the phone,
>>Why are you avoiding talking about my hair loss status?
>>He said he would admit his negligence, but he never said that today.
>
>I'd like to admit my mistake, apologize, and ask for your understanding to make it again. Hmm...
>I think the officials, the designer in charge, and the branch managers..That's right...
>The above people in the company don't know the process... I hope it's resolved well

When it comes to negligence, it doesn't mean exactly where and how there's a problem, but it's saying it extensively
Therefore, it is difficult to say that the technical part was wrong.
However, we bow down and apologize for not being able to satisfy you.
Even though we said we would make a new product, the problem is not solved because we continue to demand refunds, mental compensation, and transportation costs.
We will always try to give you satisfaction in consideration of your difficulties.
Once again, we apologize for the inconvenience.