the latest popular post

Last week's comment ranking

1back K4984376008
2back cyunty99
3back K4979166048
4back K4947088346
5back K44061050622508202112

6back K4964508705
7back 겸이경이
8back 탈모는극복하는것
9back 이마줄여와
10back K4974452272

[General] [re] If it's H, it's H, right? There were a lot of problems.

21years ago
819

I'm also currently using Company H's product. It's true that there are some problems.
In particular, if it's a problem such as a refund, the attitude of the service will change 180 degrees.
Geolguk knows well that those who have to wear wigs can't help it even if it's a shame.
When I go to counseling at the beginning, I'm very kind.
I'm just trying to sell it to you. I'm talking to you...
I don't think we should fall for that trick.
>
>>
>>>6 people in charge attended, and the words I said over the phone continued again, starting with the words to decide a dispute over the problem.
>>>> To conclude the problem as I have, the repair request for the front forehead was recorded only 3 times in the first wig, and it was fixed even if it was fixed by 1mm, and there was a difference of 5mm compared to the original plate (which was printed before wearing a wig), so I repeatedly asked for repairs and asked why didn't I fix it this much. There are three times left on the record, but I only repeated that I did my best to say that it was only this much, and that if there is a lie on the record, I will be punished. And don't you think you need to fix it bigger if you've repeated it a few times Lastly, I can't talk anymore
>>> When I asked if I should at least fix it prominently, I made an excuse that if I suddenly raise it, I can't reduce it later. In the end, how long does it mean that the repair will continue, and did we have to use the best-known Beomeo branch for the repair?
>>>
>>> And I heard that I visited the Daegu branch about 11 times a month
>>>It's a lie and I just repeated that it came down six times.
>>> I already said that on the phone, and I'm not sure about the number of times, so think so
Despite being >>>, the Daegu person in charge repeated the advantage several times. I don't know why you emphasize this point when it's not like coming down and trying to pick a fight over the refund amount and compensation.
>>>
>>> The conclusion is that Company H's position is not responsible for the problem on the record,
>>>> I told Company H's position that I, as a user, have too many complaints.
>>>You have to cover the examination to get a refund, and you invited me to Daegu to cover the dispute
>> It's all.
>>>
>>>My position was to compare the hair loss status of the wig and the spring pool to determine the dispute, but
>>>> Company H avoided the benefit without answering.
>>>>Was it necessary to bring someone to Daegu while struggling again for this kind of documentary debate
>>> You can talk about this on the phone,
>>>>Why are you avoiding talking about my hair loss status?
>>> After that, he said he would admit his negligence, but he never said that today.
>>
>>I'd like to admit my fault, apologize, and ask for your understanding to make it again. Hmm...
>>I think the officials, the designer in charge, and the branch managers..That's right...
>>The above people in the company don't know the process... I hope it's resolved well
>
>
>Fault doesn't mean exactly where and how there's a problem, but saying it extensively
>Because of this, it's hard to say that I did the technical part wrong.
>However, we bow down and apologize for not being able to satisfy you.
>Even though we said we would make a new product, the problem is not solved because we continue to demand refunds, mental compensation, and transportation costs.
>We will always try to give you satisfaction in consideration of your difficulties.
>Once again, I apologize for the inconvenience.